xevion/undefined.behavio.rs
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/Xevion/undefined.behavio.rs.git synced 2025-12-13 10:13:31 -06:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Add real test post

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Xevion
2023-11-24 03:47:40 -06:00
parent a6b9894498
commit f8575fe467
2 changed files with 186 additions and 1 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

1
src/layouts/Post.astro
View File

@@ -3,6 +3,5 @@ import Base from '@layouts/Base.astro';
--- ---
<Base> <Base>
testing 123
<slot /> <slot />
</Base> </Base>

186
src/pages/posts/race-conditions-in-signal-handlers.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,186 @@
---
title: "Race Conditions in Signal Handlers"
pubDate: 2023-07-26 16:08:12 -0500
description: "Signals offer a unique, low-level way of communicating with processes. But under certain circumstances, they can kill processes, even when they shouldn't."
layout: "@layouts/Post.astro"
---
Signals offer a unique, low-level way of communicating with processes. But under certain circumstances, they can kill
processes, even when they should work.
> This article is a deep dive on a classic race condition issue. If you're hoping for an elegant and interesting article
> on how I identified a critical vulnerability in `tar`, I'm sorry to say - there's no such vulnerability.
> It all boils down to a simple race condition issue.
Signals are a special, but very primitive way for processes to communicate functionality. Signals are useful as they are
a standardized interface available to 99.99% of programs run on UNIX systems (in existence). Interaction can be done
with just the `kill` command.
While the signals API can be quite bare bones and simple, it's technically much less complex compared to a network
interface, usage of STDIN/STDOUT, a file, or even a shared memory segment. These other options might have a lot more
features,
but none of them are perfectly standardized, completely secure, or simple to use.
If you're looking to allow basic communication with your program for very specific use cases and don't need complexity
or I/O, signals can be a great way to go.
## The `tar` command
> This section is a bit of a tangent, but it's a great example of how signals can be used in practice, as well
> as how I came across this issue. Skip to the next section if you just want to hear the error & solution.
The `tar` command is a ubiquitous tool for creating and extracting archives. It's a very simple tool, but it's
extremely powerful. It's also a great example of a program that uses signals.
A couple months ago, I was writing software to help bootstrap embedded devices. The software would use `tar` to extract
a filesystem onto the device's eMMC. Due to the size of the filesystem and the speed of the device, this process could
take some time - I wanted to add a progress bar to confirm that the process was still running & progress was being made.
Unfortunately, `tar` doesn't emit progress information under normal circumstances, and no alternatives were available
in my language of choice that maintained the speed of `tar`. But looking into the documentation, `tar` could receive
specific, designated signals to [emit progress information][checking-tar-progress] for both archival and extraction
operations.
By starting `tar` with the `--totals` flag, it would emit a statistic when the operation completes. But to request
information during the operation, a signal must be chosen, like so `tar -x -f archive.tar --totals=SIGUSR1`.
Emitting a signal can be done with the `kill` command, like so: `kill -USR1 <pid>`. This will send the `USR1` signal
to the process with the given PID. The `USR1` signal is a user-defined signal, and is not used by the system.
And so, my plan was to start a tar process as usual with the `--totals` flag, and then send the `USR1` signal to the
process occasionally to query an extraction operation's progress. In Python, I used the `subprocess` module to start
and manage the process.
```python
import os
import subprocess
import signal
import time
import sys
# Define the command to execute
command = ["tar", "-xpf", sys.argv[2], "-C", sys.argv[1], "--totals=SIGUSR1"]
# Start the subprocess
print(' '.join(command))
process = subprocess.Popen(command, preexec_fn=os.setsid, stderr=subprocess.PIPE)
try:
while True:
# Ping the subprocess with SIGUSR1 signal
# NOTWORK: process.send_signal(signal.SIGUSR1)
# NOTWORK: os.killpg(os.getpgid(process.pid), signal.SIGUSR1)
subprocess.Popen(["kill", "-SIGUSR1", str(process.pid)])
print(process.stderr.readline().decode("utf-8").strip())
# print(process.stdout.readline().decode("utf-8").strip())
# Wait for a specified interval
time.sleep(1.9) # Adjust the interval as needed
except KeyboardInterrupt:
# Handle Ctrl+C to gracefully terminate the script
process.terminate()
# Wait for the subprocess to complete
process.wait()
```
You'll notice I have three different ways to send signals shown, but only one of them is working. Moreover, instead
of the signal not working like expected, the signal actually kills the process. When checked the exit code,
one will find that the status code is the same as the signal number, but negated.
For example, `SIGUSR1` exits with `-10`, `SIGUSR2` exits with `-12`, and `SIGHUP` exits with `-2`. In fact,
when you look into signals, this is the default behavior for processes exited by signals.
## Signal Handlers Aren't Instant
To my surprise, the handlers that programs like `tar` provide aren't available instantly - so much so that even Python
can send a signal before they're registered.
I am still not sure as to how signal handlers are implemented - I would've assumed they are static, unchanging, and
registered at program start, but that doesn't seem to be the case - or at least, Python can beat them to the punch.
Whatever the case, the issue with my implementation is that the signal is sent before the handler is registered, and
the default behavior of the signal takes over. For many signals (including the one\[s] I was using), this is to **terminate**
the process.
## How to wait for Signal Handlers
Besides just waiting for a second, there's a way to wait for signal handlers to be registered. Or rather,
there's a way to check whether signal handlers have been provided or a process.
On Unix systems (which is the only place you're going to find Unix signals), there's a special pseudo-filesystem that
provides intimate details on a process. This includes things like the process's name, state, PID, memory usage, threads,
and of course: _signal handlers_.
See below, the contents of `/proc/<pid>/status` for a process:
```
File: /proc/100162/status
1 │ Name: Isolated Web Co
2 │ Umask: 0002
3 │ State: S (sleeping)
4 │ Tgid: 100162
5 │ Ngid: 0
6 │ Pid: 100162
7 │ PPid: 6225
8 │ TracerPid: 0
9 │ Uid: 1000 1000 1000 1000
10 │ Gid: 1000 1000 1000 1000
11 │ FDSize: 512
12 │ Groups: 4 27 123 1000 1001
13 │ NStgid: 100162
14 │ NSpid: 100162
...
...
...
33 │ CoreDumping: 0
34 │ THP_enabled: 1
35 │ Threads: 27
36 │ SigQ: 0/62382
37 │ SigPnd: 0000000000000000
38 │ ShdPnd: 0000000000000000
39 │ SigBlk: 0000000000000000
40 │ SigIgn: 0000000001011002
41 │ SigCgt: 0000000f40800ef8 <--- Focus on this line.
42 │ CapInh: 0000000000000000
43 │ CapPrm: 0000000000000000
```
We're interested in `SigCgt` (line 41), which is a bitmask of signals that are caught by the process. The specific bit depends on the platform, but in Python, this can be found in the signal module:
```python
>>> from signal import SIGUSR1
>>> print(SIGUSR1)
10
```
We can parse the `SigCgt` value using the the `int` function and setting the radix to 16 (hexadecimal).
```python
>>> int("0000000f40800ef8", 16)
65506643704
```
Checking whether or not the Nth bit is set can be done with the bitwise AND operator (`&`) and a bitshift (`<<`).
```python
>>> sigcgt = int("0000000f40800ef8", 16)
>>> mask = 1 << (SIGUSR1 - 1)
>>> sigcgt & mask
512
```
If the result is non-zero, the bit is set. If the result is zero, the bit is not set.
By simply polling the process's signal handlers, we can wait for the signal handler to be registered before sending the `SIGUSR1` signal.
### Credits
Credit to [Eryk Sun][python-discuss-solution] for explaining the issue and providing an immaculate solution to signal
handlers in Python.
[python-discuss-solution]: https://discuss.python.org/t/os-kill-signals-not-being-received-correctly-alternative-is-kill-sigusr1-command/26913/6
[checking-tar-progress]: https://www.gnu.org/software/tar/manual/html_section/verbose.html